Tokyo Dispatch
Crime
Tokyo DispatchJapan, in English

Tokyo court rejects Maezawa's suit against Meta over impersonation ads

The ruling leaves platforms under no duty to hunt down scam ads that use a celebrity's name and face, in a year when SNS investment fraud cost victims ¥128.8 billion.

By Newsroom1 min read
Tokyo court rejects Maezawa's suit against Meta over impersonation ads
Meta headquarters in Menlo Park in the western US. (x)

The Tokyo District Court on Tuesday dismissed a lawsuit by entrepreneur Yusaku Maezawa seeking the removal of impersonation scam ads from Instagram and Facebook, declining to order operator Meta or its Japanese subsidiary to act or to pay damages.

Maezawa deliberately limited his damages claim to ¥1, his side said, to establish what responsibility social media operators bear for such ads. The court ordered no compensation at all.

According to the National Police Agency, so-called SNS investment fraud — con artists posing as celebrities to extract money for investments or fees — cost victims ¥128.8 billion in 2025.

Maezawa's side argued that the only fundamental fix is to stop celebrities from being used in scam ads without their consent.

The ads and the complaint

According to the complaint, scam ads inviting investment began appearing on Instagram and Facebook using Maezawa's name and photographs without permission by around June 2023 at the latest.

When Maezawa's side asked Meta in August 2023 to take the ads down, the company replied that it was working to resolve the problem, according to the complaint. The ads continued.

Maezawa sued in May 2024, arguing that the ads infringed his portrait rights and his publicity rights — the right to exclusively profit from his name and image.

Meta's defense

Meta countered that the people chiefly responsible for the scam ads were unidentified posters. The company argued it had no obligation to find and delete such ads. It also said image-recognition technology at the time could not have identified them with certainty.

The Yokohama District Court reached the same conclusion in a separate suit over scam ads left on Meta's platforms, dismissing that claim on Oct. 15.